” Brainwashing Children”

May 15, 2016 § Leave a comment

This page ” Brainwashing Children” has some very good pieces on Parental Alienation. Please take the time to view the page and like it! Take the time and then take a stand against Alienation! Take a stand against Child Abuse! Let’s put the Children First! Parents, if you love your children as much as you profess to, especially on Facebook….. then don’t be an Alienator! Don’t be That Parent!!!! ~Mary Prayne

Federal Practice Manual for Legal Aid Attorneys

May 15, 2016 § Leave a comment

Federal Practice Manual for Legal Aid Attorneys

link: http://federalpracticemanual.org/node/3

I found this stuff online line so I put it together in case anyone is interested or needs. I think it can be very helpful in federal stuff

The appearance of Scumbags never end in ILLINOIS?

March 5, 2016 § Leave a comment

RECENTLY FILED DISCIPLINARY DECISIONS FROM SUPREME COURT

SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS

THURSDAY, JANUARY 21, 2016

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ANNOUNCEMENTS:

MISCELLANEOUS RECORD

M.R.27676 – In re: Joel Clark Runkle. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Joel Clark Runkle is suspended from the practice of law for six (6) months and until further order of the Court and until he pays restitution in the amount of $1,500 to Margarette Clarkin.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27696 – In re: John Joseph Lynch. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent John Joseph Lynch is suspended from the practice of law for thirty (30) days.

Suspension effective February 11, 2016.

Respondent John Joseph Lynch shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27709 – In re: Herbert Edgar McMeen. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Herbert Edgar McMeen is suspended from the practice of law for two (2) years and until further order of the Court and required to pay restitution in the amount of $4,693.67 to LaDonna Holder as a condition of any reinstatement.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27710 – In re: Howard Reich. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Review Board is allowed and respondent Howard Reich is disbarred.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27712 – In re: Paul Leslie Shelton. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by respondent Paul Leslie Shelton for leave to file exceptions to the report and recommendation of the Review Board is denied. Respondent Paul Leslie Shelton is disbarred, as recommended by the Review Board.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27718 – In re: David Andre Bertha. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent David Andre Bertha is disbarred and required to pay restitution in the amount of $14,900 to Sheila Watts as a condition of any reinstatement.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27725 – In re: Grant Richard Niehus. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Grant Richard Niehus is suspended from the practice of law for ninety (90) days.

Suspension effective February 11, 2016.

Respondent Grant Richard Niehus shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27727 – In re: Anthony Campanale. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by Anthony Campanale to strike his name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(a) is allowed, effective immediately.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27728 – In re: Donald Lee Homyk. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Donald Lee Homyk is censured.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27747 – In re: Frank Joseph Edelen. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Frank Joseph Edelen is suspended from the practice of law for six (6) months and until further order of the Court.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27780 – In re: Ron L. Richards, II. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Ron L. Richards, II is suspended from the practice of law for eighteen (18) months and until further order of the Court.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27783 – In re: David J. Kiesler. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent David J. Kiesler is transfered to disability inactive status until further order of the Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 758.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27790 – In re: Harry P. Friedlander. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Harry P. Friedlander, who has been disciplined in the State of Arizona, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois for sixty (60) days followed by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed upon respondent by the Supreme Court of Arizona, until his period of probation in Arizona is successfully completed.

Suspension effective February 11, 2016.

Respondent Harry P. Friedlander shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of probation.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27795 – In re: William Byron Blanchard. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent William Byron Blanchard is suspended from the practice of law for ninety (90) days.

Suspension effective February 11, 2016.

Respondent William Byron Blanchard shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27796 – In re: Keith Elliott Yard. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Keith Elliott Yard is suspended from the practice of law for two (2) years and until further order of the Court.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27798 – In re: Shannan Hayes Bedgood. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent Shannan Hayes Bedgood is suspended from the practice of law for one (1) year and until further order of the Court.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27799 – In re: Steven Walter Whitmore. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Steven Walter Whitmore is suspended from the practice of law for thirty (30) days.

Suspension effective February 11, 2016.

Respondent Steven Walter Whitmore shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27803 – In re: Joseph Allan Morris. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Joseph Allan Morris is suspended from the practice of law for ninety (90) days.

Suspension effective February 11, 2016.

Respondent Joseph Allan Morris shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27804 – In re: William Lowell Needler. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by William Lowell Needler to be placed on permanent retirement status pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 756(a)(8) is allowed, effective immediately.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27813 – In re: George Mark Zuganelis. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by George Mark Zuganelis to strike his name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(a) is allowed, effective immediately.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27834 – In re: Brian James Russell. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Brian James Russell is censured.

Order entered by the Court.

M.R.27843 – In re: Robert Kenneth Lock Jr. (January 21, 2016)

Disciplinary Commission.

The motion by Robert Kenneth Lock Jr. to strike his name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(a) is allowed, effective immediately.

Order entered by the Court.

The Appearance the list of Scumbags is Great # and never stops because someone got caught ripen a client or the Bar off of their share?

March 5, 2016 § Leave a comment

LINK: https://www.iardc.org/co_recentdiscdec.html

So maybe before you give them any monies?

See for your self?

See if your scumbag is on the list?

NEW FILINGS, HEARING SCHEDULES AND CLERK’S OFFICE

Recent Disciplinary Decisions from Supreme Court | Recently Filed Complaints and Reports | Announcements | Schedule of Hearings | Clerk’s Office Services

RECENTLY FILED DISCIPLINARY DECISIONS FROM SUPREME COURT

This page contains links to recently filed opinions and announcements of disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court and the dates listed below. The list is sequenced in inverse chronological order with the most recent filing at the top. Click on a date listed below to go to the opinions and/or announcements issued on that date.NEW FILINGS

January 21, 2016
November 17, 2015
September 21, 2015
May 14, 2015
March 12, 2015
January 16, 2015
November 20, 2014 (opinion)
November 13, 2014
September 12, 2014
May 16, 2014
March 14, 2014
January 17, 2014
November 20, 2013
November 15, 2013 (opinion)
September 25, 2013
May 22, 2013
May 20, 2013
March 15, 2013
January 18, 2013
November 19, 2012
September 17, 2012
May 18, 2012
March 19, 2012
January 20, 2012 (opinion)
January 13, 2012
November 22, 2011
November 17, 2011
September 26, 2011
September 22, 2011 (opinion)
September 20, 2011
May 18, 2011
March 21, 2011
January 19, 2011
November 12, 2010
September 23, 2010
September 22, 2010
September 20, 2010
May 18, 2010
May 17, 2010
March 16, 2010
January 21, 2010
November 17, 2009
September 22, 2009
June 4, 2009 (opinion)
May 18, 2009
March 16, 2009
January 20, 2009
November 18, 2008
September 17, 2008
September 16, 2008
May 19, 2008
March 17, 2008
January 23, 2008
November 20, 2007
September 18, 2007
May 18, 2007
March 19, 2007
January 12, 2007
November 17, 2006
September 21, 2006
September 20, 2006
May 18, 2006 (opinion)
May 16, 2006
March 23, 2006 (opinion)
March 21, 2006
March 20, 2006
January 17, 2006
January 13, 2006
November 22, 2005
September 27, 2005
September 26, 2005
June 13, 2005
May 20, 2005
May 19, 2005
March 22, 2005
March 18, 2005
January 14, 2005
November 19, 2004
November 17, 2004
September 27, 2004
September 24, 2004
May 18, 2004
May 17, 2004
May 14, 2004
March 15, 2004
March 12, 2004
January 23, 2004 (opinion)
January 20, 2004
January 16, 2004
November 20, 2003 (opinion)
November 20, 2003
November 17, 2003
November 14, 2003
November 14, 2003
October 16, 2003
October 14, 2003
September 25, 2003
September 24, 2003
September 22, 2003
September 19, 2003
May 22, 2003
April 1, 2003
March 19, 2003
January 24, 2003
January 23, 2003
November 26, 2002
November 21, 2002 (opinion)
September 20, 2002
September 19, 2002
May 24, 2002
March 26, 2002
March 22, 2002
January 30, 2002
January 29, 2002
January 28, 2002
November 28, 2001
November 29, 2001
September 21, 2001
September 20, 2001

The Appearance that Pam L. office has lots of shadows and they run deep into the pockets of Title IV monies and Massive GREED from the state actors.

March 5, 2016 § Leave a comment

The Herald-Review (Decatur IL, USA)
21 February 1999
Former State Resident Given Formal Apology by Illinois Division of Child Support Enforcement.

by Amanda Wilson

The Illinois State Supreme Court has ordered Guy Hastings, Director of Child Support Enforcement, to send a formal letter of apology to a former Illinois state resident who was forced to pay $9000 more in support than ordered. Paul Laird, now a resident of Washington state and a former resident of Strasburg, IL, has said he will make a written statement in a few days. The Court also ordered DCSE to pay him almost $150,000 in punitive damages.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Mr. Laird was ordered to pay $400/mo in child support in 1985. Kankakee County records indicate Mr. Laird had voluntarily overpaid his account by May, 1991. That is when his troubles started.

Mr. Laird was forced to take a medical leave of absence due to Multiple Sclerosis. He presented Illinois DCSE doctor statements and 7 requests for temporary reduction from November 1991 through May, 1993. He was never answered by Illinois DCSE and they now admit that he did send the request and that those requests were ignored. They also admit Mr. Laird never missed a payment.

A suit was filed by DCSE in November, 1993 to modify the child support award. Mr. Laird was never notified of this hearing. The department received a default judgment increasing the support amount to $800. DCSE admits Mr. Laird was never notified of the new amount.

The amount was reduced in 1996 back to the original $400 figure. DCSE CONTINUED to count the extra $400 from November 1993 to October, 1996 as child support arrears. They garnished his wages, filed liens against him, reported him to CREDIT BUREAUS and continue collection thought taking his IRS refunds. Mr. Laird filed suit in 1996 against DCSE and specific employees within that agency. The Appellate Court awarded him almost $60,000 in January, 1998. That judgment has been paid.

The State’s Attorney of Champaign County filed charges of malfesciance of office against three DCSE employees – Karen Breaker, Linda Richardson, and Barbara McCloud. Breaker and Richardson were also tried on perjury, falsifiction of records, and theft. McCloud was found not guilty in November, 1998. Breaker plead guilty to the charge of perjury and falsification in a plea bargain. Ms. Richardson was found guilty on all counts and sentenced to 18 months in prison. All three lost their jobs with
Illinois DCSE.

This is only the first of 8 cases against the Champaign office. In the most recent case a custodial mother received child support payments 9 months after the father made payments through the court. The father in this case was prosecuted for non-payment and was found not guilty when he presented receipts and cancelled checks. A check by the Auditor’s office revealed a practice by the Champaign office of putting support checks in a hidden fund to draw interest for the state. That case has been merged with 7 others in a class action lawsuit. It is scheduled to be heard in April, 2000.

Governor Ryan and his cabinet were unavailable for comment. This reporter has verified that the governor urged DCSE to settle this case out-of-court and that Mr. Hastings refused. DCSE director Hastings also had no comment.

Because the state was found to have acted fraudulently in his case, the Supreme Court had to rule on punitive damages.

WHO ARE THE BOND HOLDERS OF YOUR CITY AND COUNTY ? LIARS AND JUDGES IT HAS APPEARANCE THEY HAVE UNCLEAN HANDS IN THESE ISSUES?

December 22, 2014 § Leave a comment

LOOK WHO THE BOND HOLDERS OF YOUR CITY ARE AND HOW THEY PAST HANDS AND HOW THEY REPAIR AND TRANSFER PROPERTIES BETWEEN EACH OTHER AND HOW THEY TRANSFERS OF PUBLIC MONIES ARE USED TO ENRICH THE SYSTEMS THEY ARE FUNDING THEIR OWN PRIVATE RETIREMENT FUNDS?
THE CLERKS OFFICE,SHERIFFS,COURTS,CHILD SUPPORT THEY ARE ALL CORPORATIONS THEY ALL PRAY OFF OF EACH OTHERS KIND OF A WELL ORGANIZED MONOGAMY SYSTEMS DEEPLY ENGRAINED IN DAILY LIFE?

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing the Will county bad lawyers(LIARS) category at Will County Pro-se.