Darren M. Griffin, Crystal Bay Corporation: Doesn’t Pass the Duck Test – Possible FRAUD Upon The Courts Posted on August 8, 2014 by DieTrollDie Time for a Duck Test again. If you are unfamiliar with this term, it simply means that if something looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. On 4 Aug 14, Michael Patzer, Excipio GmbH, disclosed that the “Forensic Investigative Service” provider, Crystal Bay Corporation (CBC), a South Dakota Shelf-Company, contracts its BitTorrent monitoring systems/servers from Excipio GmbH (Germany). [Also see this article] Doc_89_Decl_MichaelPatzer_Rule 11_00395(WA) Not a great shock, as we assumed that the German BT monitoring companies were behind this aspect. What has been a bit of a mystery is who is “Darren M. Griffin,” “software consultant,” that CBC uses to support various Copyright Troll cases. Mr. Griffin is responsible for providing declarations that justified the early discovery of ISP subscriber’s information in multiple cases (with multiple different Plaintiffs) in the US. Internet search are pretty sparse for Mr. Griffin. The name is relatively common, but nothing matching a software consultant for a company (CBC) that provides forensic investigative services to copyright owners. Couple that with the fact that CBC is a SD shelf-company run out of a mail-drop and it looks like Mr. Griffin doesn’t exists. That or Mr. Griffin is another Alan Cooper (AKA: Fraud upon the court). See the later part of this previous post for additional details on CBC. Now I know some people are going to say that DTD is simply a pro-piracy lunatic and there is nothing suspicious about this. Then I suggest the doubters (and judges!) need to look just a little deeper and not take what the Copyright Trolls have to say at face value. Time For A Closer Look I decided to take a small sampling of the declarations from Darren M. Griffin. Note: I know there are plenty more out there, so please feel free to send me a copy of any Darren M. Griffen declarations you have. Here are the five I used – Decl_Griffin_01658(GA) Decl_Griffin_00603(TN) Decl_Griffin_00129(TN) Decl_DGriffin_02911(CO) Complaint_Decl_Griffin_00727(AZ) I then took screen-shots of the signature portions of the declarations and grouped them together. I guess signing your initials could be a signature – but it still seems very odd and suspicious IMO. Take a look and tell me what YOU think. I’m no hand-writing expert, but none of them look the same or even similar. It looks like the stupid Trolls couldn’t even keep the signatures straight – How very Prenda of them. I also want to point out that under two of the signatures is the number “60998770.1” – If anyone has an idea of what this means, please contact me. Griffin_Sig_Compare_1 Griffin_Sig_Compare_2Griffin_Sig_Compare_3 So do you think Darren M. Griffin passes the Duck Test? My opinion is it sure looks like a “FRAUD” and not a duck.

Darren M. Griffin, Crystal Bay Corporation: Doesn’t Pass the Duck Test – Possible FRAUD Upon The Courts
Posted on August 8, 2014 by DieTrollDie
Time for a Duck Test again. If you are unfamiliar with this term, it simply means that if something looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

On 4 Aug 14, Michael Patzer, Excipio GmbH, disclosed that the “Forensic Investigative Service” provider, Crystal Bay Corporation (CBC), a South Dakota Shelf-Company, contracts its BitTorrent monitoring systems/servers from Excipio GmbH (Germany). [Also see this article] Doc_89_Decl_MichaelPatzer_Rule 11_00395(WA) Not a great shock, as we assumed that the German BT monitoring companies were behind this aspect. What has been a bit of a mystery is who is “Darren M. Griffin,” “software consultant,” that CBC uses to support various Copyright Troll cases. Mr. Griffin is responsible for providing declarations that justified the early discovery of ISP subscriber’s information in multiple cases (with multiple different Plaintiffs) in the US.

Internet search are pretty sparse for Mr. Griffin. The name is relatively common, but nothing matching a software consultant for a company (CBC) that provides forensic investigative services to copyright owners. Couple that with the fact that CBC is a SD shelf-company run out of a mail-drop and it looks like Mr. Griffin doesn’t exists. That or Mr. Griffin is another Alan Cooper (AKA: Fraud upon the court). See the later part of this previous post for additional details on CBC.

Now I know some people are going to say that DTD is simply a pro-piracy lunatic and there is nothing suspicious about this. Then I suggest the doubters (and judges!) need to look just a little deeper and not take what the Copyright Trolls have to say at face value.

Time For A Closer Look

I decided to take a small sampling of the declarations from Darren M. Griffin. Note: I know there are plenty more out there, so please feel free to send me a copy of any Darren M. Griffen declarations you have. Here are the five I used – Decl_Griffin_01658(GA) Decl_Griffin_00603(TN) Decl_Griffin_00129(TN) Decl_DGriffin_02911(CO) Complaint_Decl_Griffin_00727(AZ)

I then took screen-shots of the signature portions of the declarations and grouped them together. I guess signing your initials could be a signature – but it still seems very odd and suspicious IMO. Take a look and tell me what YOU think. I’m no hand-writing expert, but none of them look the same or even similar. It looks like the stupid Trolls couldn’t even keep the signatures straight – How very Prenda of them. I also want to point out that under two of the signatures is the number “60998770.1” – If anyone has an idea of what this means, please contact me.

Griffin_Sig_Compare_1

Griffin_Sig_Compare_2Griffin_Sig_Compare_3

So do you think Darren M. Griffin passes the Duck Test? My opinion is it sure looks like a “FRAUD” and not a duck.