Mom awaiting trial for nightmares about killing kids: Defence 15
August 15, 2013 § Leave a comment
Mom awaiting trial for nightmares about killing kids: Defence
QMI AGENCY
FIRST POSTED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 2013 12:16 PM EDT | UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 2013 12:25 PM EDT
MONTREAL – A mother of seven from north of Montreal is awaiting trial after being arrested in April for dreaming of killing her children, her lawyer alleges.
The 38-year-old mother, whose name can’t be published to protect the identity of her children, allegedly told Quebec’s child protective services that she had recurring nightmares of entering her daughters’ room and stabbing them to death with a knife.
Two weeks after she told her story to Quebec’s child welfare agency, police arrested her and charged her with assault with a weapon, possessing a weapon, and for failing to provide the necessities of life.
“I never wanted to hurt my children,” the mother told QMI Agency. “There was never even a knife, it was a dream.”
Valerie De Guise, the mother’s lawyer, told QMI Agency the criminal accusations will likely not stick because they are based on her client’s statements to the child agency.
The mother of seven was jailed for 90 days and hasn’t seen her children since her arrest.
The Crown declined to comment.
http://www.illinoisdivorcedigest.com/index. so you thought you had some privacy on what the liars say?
August 10, 2013 § Leave a comment
They want to make you pay 250.00 to get a peak at how they denagrate you your children and your ex and tell how they did it well insider do tell and the info they give is just grand and ohh so funny that it sickens the reasonable people of this state?
Well its time to start posting oh about the appearance of there impoprity on how telling they have the abuse of the best intrest to extort what should go to our children into there own coffers.
A famous quote from the chicago list of cr and gals is this is the best action of getting anything i want in payment because now i have better protection than a judge and the ardc is protecting us all we have to do is push more funds their way .
Well so do all the reasonable people let the select group of chosen to destroy future voters of illinois population into thinking that this is how life is expected to be for their life in the future in illinois?
The appearance that people should call their reps and senators and say they will what this actions against the children of our state to stop and see whom we vote for in the next election ?
PLease give us a few words of your voice on these and other matters?
Attorney Jeannine Talbot of Torrington, CT; unethical Dufus,Stupid,Liar,unprofessional?
July 28, 2013 § Leave a comment
Attorney Jeannine Talbot of Torrington, CT; unethical Dufus
The state of Connecticut provided Jeannine M. Talbot with a law license in 1993.
The Statewide Grievance Committee found Jeannine guilty of the following misconduct.
In one matter, Jeannine represented a husband and wife in a foreclosure action. The wife met with Jeannine to discuss the case and gave her a $200 retainer. Jeannine then filed an appearance with the trial court. Over the next six months, Jeannine only communicated with the client’s daughter who was a close personal friend about the client’s case. During this time, Jeannine never had any direct communication with her clients.
Subsequently, the foreclosure plaintiff filed a Demand for Disclosure of Defense, which Jeannine failed to respond too. Shortly thereafter, due to Jeannine’s gross negligence, the trial court granted the plaintiff’s request for a Foreclosure by Default. Jeannine failed to advise her client of the default judgment during a phone call with the client.
As a result of Jeannine’s gross negligence and incompetence, the client fired her and retained another attorney.
As a consequence of his misconduct, the cheerleaders for Attorney Misfits sitting on the Statewide Grievance Committee punished Jeannine by gifting her with a complimentary reprimand.
As we speak (ca. July 2013) Jeannine practices at 185 Albert Street in Torrington, Connecticut.
|
They are the nations premier leader in stealing money be this way or through child support through title IVA-F.
July 26, 2013 § Leave a comment
This is real like stuff here folks and it doesn’t take alot to look at whom is behind the doors of these privately held co. if they get money from the state or fed they have to expose some of their books if we make them.
So the appearance that it is on a higher level well your right but don’t look to far cause it well to close to home they play with more than one mask?
What about the families they have already destroyed on over 35 plus years and not just in our country ?
How do we make a differance speak up ,stand up and be heard protest peacefully alot .
From the Michigan DHS website:
· In 2008, DHS and private agencies completed 2,638 adoptions and received $875,000 in federal funds for the accomplishment. In 2009, DHS and private agencies completed 3,030 adoptions – more than ever before – and were awarded a $3.5 million federal adoption incentive award for the accomplishment.
· In 2008, there were 6,315 foster children residing with unlicensed relatives. The agreement required Michigan to move the children to licensed settings or relative homes approved for a waiver. As of October 2010, the state is in 99 percent compliance.
DHS receives $4,000- $6,000 per child placed in foster care from Social Security Title IV-E, but no $ if they do not find abuse & neglect, or if they leave the child at home or place the child with a relative that is not licensed.
Every day in America children are being sold for sex. Globally more than 1.8 million children are used in commercial sex.
July 26, 2013 § Leave a comment
An Outdated Child Protection Law is Playing A Key Role in the Growth of a Global Marketplace For Child Sex Trafficking On The Internet
ALEXANDRIA, Va., July 24, 2013 —International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children Joins 47 of the Nation’s Attorneys General in Asking Congress to Allow Local and State Authorities to Investigate Suspected Online Prostitution
ALEXANDRIA, Va., July 24, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Every day in America children are being sold for sex. Globally more than 1.8 million children are used in commercial sex. Trafficking has largely moved from the streets to the Internet where a flourishing global marketplace for child sex trafficking has emerged. The International Centre for Missing &Exploited Children is joining 47 of the nation’s Attorneys General in calling on the U.S. Congress to make a minor change to the Communications Decency Act (CDA) that was passed in 1996 to help address this problem. They are asking for a two-word change that would enable state and local governments to pursue criminal action against online classified advertising sites suspected of being involved in prostitution.
In a letter delivered today by the National Association of Attorneys General, Congress is being asked to make the following change to 47 U.S.C. 230(3)(1):
“Nothing in this section shall be construed to impair the enforcement of section 223 or 231 of this title, chapter 71 (relating to obscenity) or 110 (relating to sexual exploitation of children) of Title 18, or any other Federal OR STATE criminal statute.”
“State and local law enforcement are frequently finding that online classified ad services are being used to advertise children for sale in the U.S. and to the world. However, the CDA, which was intended to protect children from indecent material on the Internet, is now being used to escape prosecution by those who are victimizing children through prostitution and other crimes,” said Ernie Allen, President and CEO of the International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children. “A minor amendment needs to be made to update the CDA to prevent that from happening.”
The CDA currently provides civil immunity and state criminal immunity to Internet content providers regarding the words and actions of those who post on their sites. However, many online classified ad sites have created an online marketplace for prostitution including child sex trafficking.
Each child victim lives in a community somewhere in the U.S. These are local crimes against children. Yet, state and local governments are precluded from pursuing criminal action against these sites because the online advertisers are using the CDA as a shield to avoid prosecution and prevent regulation.
Absent interstate travel, federal property, or the involvement of a minor, prostitution is not a federal crime. With the current application of the CDA, a gap exists in criminal enforcement regarding prostitution promoted on the Internet. A minor amendment is needed to the CDA to extend criminal jurisdiction, currently held solely by the federal government, to state and local governments. The change proposed by the Attorneys General would not affect mainstream online content providers, would not impact innovation on the Internet and would not affect the First Amendment.
The growth of the Internet has facilitated a global marketplace for child sex trafficking. Federal law enforcement has limitations regarding what it is able to do. The CDA that was passed in 1996 for the purpose of protecting children needs to be updated to fill the gap that exists in criminal enforcement of these crimes and local and state governments need to be granted the authority to investigate and prosecute these crimes. America’s children deserve no less.
About the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC) The International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children is a private 501(c)(3) non-governmental, nonprofit organization. It is the leading agency working internationally to combat child abductionand sexual abuse and exploitation of children. The organization has built a global network of 22 nations, trained law enforcement in 121 countries and worked with parliaments in 100 countries to enact new laws on child pornography. ICMEC works in partnership with INTERPOL, the Organization of American States and the Hague Conference on Private International Law among others. For more information about ICMEC visit: www.icmec.org
Media Contact Information: newsmedia@icmec.org (703) 837-6329
SOURCE International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children
Order ReprintWELL DRESSED CROCKS OF THE COTTAGE INDUSTRIES CIVIL LITIGATION
July 5, 2013 § Leave a comment
Well dressed and the appearance of what our for fathers dreams that have been crushed and shattered beyond any essemblance of what a reasonable person would hold to be true.
Do divorce lawyers cause more death than wars?
May 28, 2013 § Leave a comment
Dear Friends,
The below article on the results of a new research and meta analysis on how divorce affects mortality. The study is shocking in its results, only to those who have not lived and worked with the men who are destroyed. This is the fruit of feminism and its drive to place the ‘feelings’ of women over the very lives of children, men, and even other women.
The tide is turning against feminism and it is hard facts that is doing it. It is the hundreds of millions who have experienced divorce first hand as a divorcing couple, the children, the extended family who have seen the lies of feminist family policy and the destruction it wrought on children, men, and even the very women who initiated the divorce.
It is these hundreds of millions who have watched the corruption and violation of basic human rights of the children, fathers, sometimes mothers, after the evil of feminism has corrupted the due processes.
All too often the legislative bodies followed the judiciary by passing laws reminiscent of Stalin and the Third Reich to support the precedence already set by crony judges and attorneys as they raided families of assets while superficially catering to the caterwauling of feminists willing to tear down their houses with their own hands and watch the lives of their children and husbands destroyed, for ‘feelings’.
It is a process of raw power exercised for the enrichment of courts, attorneys, and various government entities. It is not a system for the protection and well being of children or parents. It is a ‘harvesting’ of families. It is a pirating of the future of children and societies. Just so a few become wealthy, and a few more hang on to a steady government job with great perks. That is a form of social cannibalism.
Thanks to Jeffery for passing this along. The major media certainly won’t pick this up anytime soon.
Frank
“The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living
are now outnumbered by those who vote for a living.” — Anonymous
Subject: [EPOC_NEWS] Do divorce lawyers cause more death than wars? New meta analysis and research
Reply-To: EPOC_NEWS@yahoogroups.com
The New Research: “The Divorce Lawyer and the Mortician”
A striking correlation between divorce and premature death has been noted in a number of studies. That correlation is all the more impressive now that researchers at the University of Arizona have completed a comprehensive analysis integrating a raft of such studies. The sheer scope of this new analysis (more precisely, a meta-analysis) of divorce and mortality rates is remarkable: the Arizona scholars bring together 32 prospective studies (involving more than 6.5 million people, 160,000 deaths, and over 755,000 divorces in 11 different countries). The chief finding of this prodigious collation of data is crystal clear: the data reveal “a significant increase in risk for early death among separated/divorced adults in comparison to their married counterparts.” Quantifying the elevation of risk, the researchers calculate that when divorced adults are compared to married peers, they face “a 23% increase in the probability of being dead from all causes at each future assessment.”
Through further parsing of the data, the researchers establish that “relative to women, men evidenced significantly greater risk for early death following divorce.” Their statistical model also reveals that adults who were “younger than 65 years at the start of the study evidenced greater risk for early death following divorce than did participants who were older than 65 years at the start of the study.” Though the risk associated with divorce seemed particularly pronounced among younger men, that risk was remarkably widespread, appearing in country after country, study after study. So robust was this linkage between divorce and early death that the researchers conclude that “the number of control variables . . . was unassociated with mortality risk.”
The researchers acknowledge that “selection effects” may account for at least part of the linkage between divorce and premature death. Health problems may themselves help cause divorce and then death. Still, the researchers can find “no evidence that selection processes can explain the entirety of the divorce/mortality association.” In other words, it appears quite possible that divorce itself is, at least to some degree, a “causal influence on increased risk for early mortality.”
Highlighting the ways that divorce may help cause early death, the researchers note that “as a psychological and interpersonal stressor, divorce has the potential to disrupt biological processes that are important to health and well-being and, in doing so, can increase risk for health problems.” This point is clarified by evidence that “marital separation and divorce are associated with a wide range of negative health behaviors.” Compared to married peers, the divorced are much more likely to experience “severe insomnia and problems of sleep maintenance.” The divorced are also more likely to use alcohol and tobacco than are their married peers, but they are less likely to maintain healthy habits such as eating breakfast and exercising regularly. Nor can the researchers ignore the way divorce impoverishes men and women, so exposing them to possibly lethal risks. Pointing to data showing that “men and women experience a loss of financial well-being following divorce,” the researchers cite studies indicating that “structural change in financial well-being is a robust predictor of important health outcomes.”
No one, the researchers stress, should infer from their findings that “divorce and its correlates are uniformly bad for health, whereas marriage and its correlates are uniformly good for health.” Nonetheless, the overall finding of this study is unmistakable: “on average, divorced adults are at increased risk for early mortality relative to their married counterparts.” That simple finding sums up the tragedy of tens of thousands of lives cut short prematurely since the Divorce Revolution began some 40 years ago.
(Source: Bryce J. Christensen and Nicole M. King, “New Research,” The Family in America, Winter 2013, Vol. 27 Number 1. Study: David A. Sbarra, Rita W. Law, and Robert M. Portley, “Divorce and Death: A Meta-Analysis and Research Agenda for Clinical, Social, and Health Psychology,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6.5 [September 2011]: 454-474.)
*******************************************
Where Deserted Spouses have been cheated into taking part in so-called “Family Law” the BIG LIE is that the Deserted Spouse and their children should accept and “normalise” the violation of their Families and the abuse and neglect of their children which was wrought, for profit, upon them by the legal industry and the feminist/secularist/Marxist hegemony who control the levers of power in the State.
Will County Pro-se 